Zootaxa 3869 (3): 338–342 www.mapress.com /zootaxa / Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) ZOOTAXA ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3869.3.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2CD14020-BB9B-480A-9294-E40452114183 Calicnemia fortis sp. nov. from Pakistan (Odonata: Zygoptera: Platycnemididae) RORY A. DOW1, AHMED ZIA2, MUHAMMAD NAEEM3 & MUHAMMAD ATHER RAFI2 1 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] National Insect Museum, NARC, Park Road - Islamabad, Pakistan. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 2 Abstract Calicnemia fortis sp. nov. is described from Azad Jammu and Kashmir in Pakistan and compared with other group 2 species of Calicnemia. Key words: Odonata, Zygoptera, Platycnemididae, Calicnemia, fortis, Pakistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, new species Introduction The genus Calicnemia Strand, 1926 has been known from India to the eastern side of China and southwards into peninsular Malaysia. Only Calicnemia eximia (Selys, 1863) has been recorded from Pakistan before now (e.g. Zia et al. 2011). In 2005 the second author collected specimens of a robust species of Calicnemia from Azad Jammu and Kashmir in north-eastern Pakistan. The number of postquadrangular cells (cells between the quadrilateral and the subnodus) in both fore- and hind wing is atypically high, so that the species runs out as Indocnemis Laidlaw, 1917, in the keys in Laidlaw (1917: 325) and Fraser (1933: 151). However, the species is clearly recognizable as Calicnemia by its colouration and markings, as well as the form of its genital ligula and anal appendages. The new species has no flagella on the genital ligula and hence falls into group 2 of Calicnemia as defined by Lieftinck (1984). It is described here as C. fortis sp. nov. Terminology used here for wing venation follows that in Watson & O’Farrell (1991); other terminology largely follows Westfall & May (1996). Calicnemia fortis sp. nov. (Figs. 1–7) Type material. Holotype: ♂ (ODO/ZYG/217), Pakistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Noseri, 11 v 2005, leg. S. A. Zia, deposited in the National Insect Museum, Islamabad, Pakistan. Paratype: ♂ (ODO/ZYG/ 218), data as holotype. Etymology. The species is named fortis, an adjective, meaning robust, referring to the strong build and relatively large size of the species. Description of holotype male. Head: labium dark brown. Labrum black, clypeus black except for 2 small pale, widely separated spots on postclypeus. Mandible bases black. Genae dark brown adjacent to mandible bases, elsewhere dark with irregular pale markings. An indistinct pale area at junction of frons and clypeus, frons otherwise matte black, vertex and occiput same, antennae with scape and pedicel black with brown sections at top, flagellum missing. Ocelli yellowish. Thorax (Fig. 1): Prothorax matte black with grey pruinesence covering most of propleuron, anterior lobe of pronotum and lateral anterior part of middle lobe. Synthorax matte black except for a narrow irregular yellowish stripe on metepisternum, broadest near legs where extending slightly onto mesepimeron, running above and over 338 Accepted by D. Paulson: 31 Jul. 2014; published: 1 Oct. 2014 that these examples will finally lay to rest the idea that the count of postquadrangular cells is a character of value for distinguishing Calicnemia from related genera. With the addition of C. fortis, Calicnemia consists of 22 named species, unless C. pyrrhosoma Lieftinck, 1984 is recognised; this name persists on some world Odonata checklists although it was established as a junior synonym of C. doonensis Sangal & Tyagi, 1984 by Hämäläinen (1989). Yu & Bu (2008) commented on the extent of variability of markings with age and possibly location in C. sinensis Lieftinck, 1984, and geographical variation in markings may occur in other species, so that caution is needed in separating species based entirely on colour patterns. However, structural differences in ligula and caudal appendages are also often subtle, rendering Calicnemia a difficult genus to work on. As noted by Yu & Chen (2013), some of the Chinese species “seem to be closely related, and more detailed studies are needed to clarify their true relationships”; we can only extend this statement to the whole genus. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Matti Hämaläinen for pointing out the existence of the specimen labelled as Calicnemia uenoi in RMNH, and to Akihiko Sasamoto for useful discussion. Amit Mitra provided a useful review of the manuscript. Funding for undertaking the surveys that yielded this new record was provided by the Higher Education Commission Islamabad-Pakistan under the project “Biosystematics of Dragonflies (Odonata) of Pakistan)”. References Asahina, S. (1997) Records of the Northern Vietnamese Odonata taken by the expedition members from the National Science Museum, Tokyo. 5. Coenagrionidae, Protoneuridae, Platycnemididae. Bulletin. National Science Museum, Tokyo (A), 23 (1), 17–34. Fraser, F.C. (1933) The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Odonata. Vol. I. Taylor & Francis, London, xii + 423 pp. Kumar, A. (1997) Odonata. In: The Director, Zoological Survey of India (Ed.), Fauna of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve. A World Heritage Site. Zoological Survey of India, pp. 45–47. Hämäläinen, M. (1989) Odonata from the Dehra Dun Valley (Uttar Pradesh, India) with notes on synonymy of some West Himalayan species. Odonatologica, 18 (1), 13–20. ICZN (2012) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted-sites/iczn/code/, accessed on 11 ii 20124 Laidlaw, F.F. (1917) A list of the dragonflies recorded from the Indian Empire, Part II. Records of the Indian Museum, 13 (6/20), 221–248, plates XIII–XV. Lieftinck, M.A. (1977) Ergebnisse der Bhutan–Expedition 1972 des Naturhistorischen Museums in Basel. Odonata. Entomologica Basiliensia, 2, 11–37. Lieftinck, M.A. (1984) Further notes on the specific characters of Calicnemia Strand, with a key to the males and remarks on some larval forms (Zygoptera: Platycnemididae). Odonatologica, 13 (3), 351–375. Mitra, T.R. (2002) Geographical distribution of Odonata (Insecta) of Eastern India. Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India, 19 (1), 1–208. Watson, J.A.L. & O’Farrell, A.F. (1991) Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies). In: Naumann, I.D., Carne, P.B., Lawrence, J.F., Nielsen, E.S., Spradbery, J.P., Taylor, R.W., Whitten, M.J. & Littlejohn, M.J. (Eds.), The insects of Australia, 2nd Edition, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp. 294–310. Westfall, M.J. & May, M.L. (1996) Damselflies of North America. First edition. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, x + 650 pp. Wilson, K.D.P. (2004) New Odonata from South China. Odonatologica, 33 (4), 423–432. Wilson, K.D.P. & G.T. Reels (2003) Odonata of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, part I: Zygoptera. Odonatologica, 32 (3), 237–279. Yu, X. & W. Bu (2008) A study of the genus Calicnemia in China, with the descriptions of two new species (Zygoptera: Platycnemididae). Odonatologica, 37 (3), 247–255. Yu, X. & J. Chen (2013) Calicnemia soccifera sp. nov. from Yunnan, China (Zygoptera: Platycnemididae). International Journal of Odonatology, 16 (2), 183–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2013.796275 Zia, A. (2010) Biosystematics of damselflies (Zygoptera: Odonata) of Pakistan. Ph.D. Dissertation. PMAS Arid Agric. Univ. Rawalpindi – Pakistan. Zia A., M. Naeem, M.A. Rafi, F. Naz, S. Afsheen & M. Ilyas (2011) Damselflies (Zygoptera: Odonata) of Pakistan: Part 1. Journal of Insect Science, 11 (102), 1–27. 342 · Zootaxa 3869 (3) © 2014 Magnolia Press DOW ET AL.
© Copyright 2018 ExploreDoc