International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40 (2012) 196–203 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijantimicag Review Transferable mechanisms of quinolone resistance Joaquim Ruiz a,b,∗ , Maria J. Pons a , Cláudia Gomes a a b Centre de Recerca en Salut Internacional de Barcelona (CRESIB), Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Rosselló 149-153, Barcelona, Spain CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain a r t i c l e i n f o Keywords: Quinolone resistance Qnr Qep OqxAB AAC(6 )-Ib-cr Natural transformation a b s t r a c t Quinolones were introduced into clinical practice in the late 1960s. Although quinolone resistance was described early, no transferable mechanism of quinolone resistance (TMQR) was conﬁrmed until 1998. To date, ﬁve different TMQRs have been described in the literature, including target protection (Qnr), quinolone modiﬁcation (AAC(6 )-Ib-cr), plasmid-encoded efﬂux systems (e.g. QepA or OqxAB, amongst others), effect on bacterial growth rates and natural transformation. Although TMQRs usually only result in a slight increase in the minimum inhibitory concentrations of quinolones, they possess an additive effect and may facilitate the acquisition of full quinolone resistance. The emergence of new related genes may continue in the next years. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Nalidixic acid (NAL) was the ﬁrst quinolone-derived agent demonstrating antibacterial activity as well as useful clinical parameters , being followed in the 1970s by novel compounds of this family such as pipemidic acid, although the clinical indication for these quinolones remained limited to urinary tract infections. The posterior addition of a ﬂuorine atom at position 6 of the quinolone molecule greatly enhanced its activity. Since then, a large series of molecules of this family has been synthesised and several have been introduced into clinical practice, with ciproﬂoxacin (CIP) being the most representative . However, some quinolones have been withdrawn from clinical practice following restriction of their use owing to secondary effects, including some deaths [3–5]. Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have been extensively used to treat a great variety of bacterial infections [6–9]. Moreover, some FQs possess activity against eukaryotic targets and have been studied as a possible novel antiparasitic treatment [10,11] or explored as potential antineoplastic agents . Finally, quinolones have been extensively used in veterinary practice [13,14]. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) currently considers FQs to be critically important antimicrobials, proposing very restricted use in veterinary practice , and a number of countries such as those of the European Union have forbidden some related uses (i.e. use as growth promoters). ∗ Corresponding author. Present address: Centre de Recerca en Salut Internacional de Barcelona (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic, Ediﬁci CEK, Planta 1, C/Rosselló 149-153, 08036 Barcelona, Spain. Tel.: +34 932 275 400x4547; fax: +34 932 279 853. E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Ruiz). This high level of use results in the selection and spread of quinolone-resistant microorganisms [13,16,17]. For a long time, the mechanisms of quinolone resistance described were exclusively chromosomal (Table 1), including speciﬁc amino acid substitutions in the quinolone targets (DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV), decreased quinolone uptake into bacteria owing to either alterations in the outer membrane protein composition or to overexpression of efﬂux pumps, and alterations in the expression levels of the quinolone targets [18,19]. None the less, the absence of transferable mechanisms of quinolone resistance (TMQRs) has long been of note and considered to be unlikely as quinolones are fully synthetic drugs . 2. The history of transferable mechanisms of quinolone resistance Although the ﬁrst deﬁnitively established TMQR was described in 1998 , various articles published prior to this year presented similar results [22–24]. However, these results were not conﬁrmed, or further studies showed possible data misinterpretation. In 1985, conjugation of NAL resistance was reported with a frequency of 10−6 –10−7 , but the transfer of a plasmid was not established and ethidium bromide was unable to revert the resistance in the transconjugants . Then a mechanism of resistance to NAL carried on a transposon was proposed. The presence of mutations in the quinolones targets was not analysed and no further data have been found in the literature. Acquisition of NAL resistance in an Escherichia coli K12 recipient together with the transfer of a plasmid of 20 MDa was described during a Shigella dysenteriae type 1 outbreak in Bangladesh . Selection of the transconjugants was performed in minimal medium, which minimises the bactericidal effect of quinolones 0924-8579/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.02.011 J. Ruiz et al. / International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40 (2012) 196–203 Table 1 Chromosomally encoded mechanisms of quinolone resistance. Target alterations Efﬂux pumps Outer membrane alterations Lower target expression levels Target protectiona a Chromosomally encoded Qnr-like proteins. against E. coli and probably favours the development of quinolone resistance in E. coli , and no analysis was undertaken of the possible selection of spontaneous NAL-resistant recipient E. coli mutants by the development of mutations in the quinolone targets or decreased intracellular uptake. After re-inspection of the data, the presence of spontaneous NAL-resistant mutants of the recipient E. coli rather than authentic transconjugants was conﬁrmed . Currently described TMQRs (Table 2), usually encoded within plasmids but also related to chromosomal structures , only produce a low level of resistance to quinolones, usually below the considered resistance breakpoints. However, concomitant presence of two or more of these mechanisms in the same microorganism should be taken into account because of their additive action, with an increase in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to quinolones [27–29]. Similarly, different basal levels of expression of some of these mechanisms have been described, such as QnrA or QepA determinants, which may result in different levels of resistance to quinolones [28,30]. However, on cloning the EfsQnr (Qnr-like protein from Enterococcus faecalis) into E. coli it was observed that its overexpression strongly affects the viability of host bacteria . Although a speciﬁc toxic effect of EfsQnr on the E. coli recipient cannot be excluded, this observation suggests a possible inverse relationship between the Qnr protection level against quinolone action and noxious effects on bacterial viability. The main relevance of decreased susceptibility to FQs lies in the fact that the microorganisms may develop full resistance to those antimicrobials more easily [21,27,32], and treatment with quinolones in this setting may result in therapeutic failure . However, a recent report has shown that the presence of Qnr determinants may result in a lower selection of mutations in the genes encoding the quinolone targets but in higher values of the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of FQs . 197 The presence of TMQRs in the absence of target mutations may result in microorganisms presenting resistance to NAL and FQs  or in isolates exhibiting susceptibility to NAL but intermediate or full resistance to FQs [36,37]. Interestingly, in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia the NAL-susceptible, FQ-resistant phenotype, is usual . Although a relevant role of efﬂux pumps cannot be ruled out [39,40], this microorganism presents a chromosomally encoded Qnr-like protein . Although extensively sought in Enterobacteriaceae, TMQRs have also been described in microorganisms belonging to other genera, such as Aeromonas spp., Haemophilus parasuis, Pseudomonas spp. or Staphylococcus aureus [42–46]. Retrospective studies have shown that the oldest isolates in which a qnr-like gene has been detected were collected in 1988 (one Citrobacter freundii and one Klebsiella pneumoniae from the USA and Argentina, respectively), whilst the aac(6 )-Ib-cr gene was detected in an isolate of E. coli recovered in 1998 in Israel [47,48]. Future studies will probably detect that older isolates carried these or other TMQRs. 3. Transferable mechanisms of quinolone resistance 3.1. Quinolone target protection During a study aimed at establishing the presence of extendedspectrum ␤-lactamases encoded on conjugative plasmids in Enterobacteriaceae, the transfer of a quinolone resistance determinant able to confer low-level resistance to some quinolones was detected . This study also showed that strains carrying the aforementioned plasmid acquired quinolone resistance more easily . Further studies identiﬁed the gene encoding the protein responsible for this phenomenon . This gene was named qnr (for quinolone resistance) and is currently known as qnrA1 . Similar to other Qnr-encoding genes (not qnrS type), the qnrA1 gene is located within a complex class 1 integron environment upstream from the ﬁrst qacE1–sul1 [49,51]. Although a low prevalence of Qnr determinants was shown in early studies , further studies have shown that the qnr genes are distributed worldwide, being present in different microorganisms (mainly Enterobacteriaceae) and with a prevalence that varies from area to area [39,53–55]. Table 2 Currently described transferable mechanisms of quinolone resistance (TMQRs). Plasmid encoded Generic mechanism Speciﬁc mechanism Alleles/genesa,b Year of description Quinolone target protection QnrA QnrS QnrB QnrC QnrD QnrVC AAC(6 )-Ib-crc pKM101 QepA-like OqxAB QacBIII Others 7 6 48 1 1 10 1 1998 2005 2006 2009 2009 2008 2006 1996 2007 2003 2010 2004 Enzymatic inactivation Slow growth Efﬂux pumps Exogenous exchange of DNA Natural transformation a 2 1 1 1 GyrA/ParC One QnrS (GenBank accession no. AEG47318) and one QnrB (GenBank accession no. ABO93588) allele, although fully sequenced in the GenBank database, were not present in http://www.lahey.org/qnrStudies (last accessed 9 January 2011). Similarly, no QnrVC is present in the aforementioned internet repository; GenBank accession nos. for possible members of this Qnr family are presented in Fig. 1. b Not all of these Qnr-like proteins have been described in plasmids. c The presence of two subvariants has been proposed [aac(6 )-Ib-crA and aac(6 )-Ib-crC], deﬁned on the basis of a mute change in the amino acid codon encoding R102 (AGG or CGG) . 198 J. Ruiz et al. / International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40 (2012) 196–203 The Qnr proteins are pentapeptide-repeat proteins (PRPs) characterised by a tandem ﬁve amino acid repeat with the recurrent motif [Ser, Thr, Ala or Val] [Asp or Asn] [Leu or Phe] [Ser, Thr or Arg] [Gly] . Although their original function remains unknown, one possibility is their involvement in protection against natural DNA gyrase inhibitors such as microcin B17 , like other members of the PRP family such as McbG or MfpA proteins [58,59] or other unrelated proteins such as GyrI [60,61]. The Qnr proteins interact with DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, hindering the action of the quinolones and minimising their inhibitory effect as has been shown by different in vitro studies [49,62]. Crystallography studies have shown that Qnr proteins are dimers and that, in general, each one folds into a right-handed ␤-helix (like other PRPs) with nine complete coils [31,63,64]. In plasmid-encoded and some chromosomally encoded Qnr proteins, two non-canonical PRP sequences interrupt the threading of pentapeptides into the ␤-helical fold, producing outward projecting loops (loop A and loop B) that interrupt the regularity of the PRP surface [63,64]. In QnrB1, deletion of loop B results in the lack of a protective effect, whereas deletion of loop A drastically reduces the protective effect . Similar results have been shown in AhQnr (chromosomal Qnr-like protein from Aeromonas hydrophila) . Xiong et al.  proposed that AhQnr might locate in the gyrase structure interacting by electrostatic charges, whilst loop A interacts with the GyrA ‘tower’ and loop B with GyrB (TOPRIM domain). Thus, Qnr proteins acting as a DNA mimic might reduce the amount of the holoenzyme–DNA complex, minimising the possibility of the quinolones cleaving this structure and producing DNA breakage . A similar mechanism of action has been proposed for other Qnr-like proteins such as MfpA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis , in accordance with the ‘poison’ theory that proposes stable barriers to the replication or transcription processes associated with the action of quinolones on the complex holoenzyme–DNA, which would be directly responsible for the killing activity of quinolones . Alternatively, it has been proposed that Qnr proteins act by binding to and destabilising the complex topoisomerase–quinolone–DNA, favouring the regeneration of a catalytically active form of the topoisomerase . Five families of Qnr proteins have been established according to their DNA homology, each one comprising one or more alleles (sequence possessing at least one difference at the amino acid level): QnrA (7 alleles); QnrB (48 alleles); QnrS (6 alleles); QnrC (1 allele); and QnrD (1 allele) (Table 2; Fig. 1) [50,53,69–72]. In addition, the QnrVC family (10 alleles) has recently been described [46,73,74]. QnrVC alleles are transferable  and some of them have been reported to be encoded within an integron environment, such as QnrVC4 (protein GenBank accession no. ADI55014) or an unnamed ORF (DNA GenBank accession no. GU944730). Thus, QnrVC4 has been described within a complex class 1 integron located in a large non-conjugative plasmid in Aeromonas caviae , whilst the unnamed ORF was described within an integron environment in Acinetobacter baumannii. Moreover, different Qnr-like proteins have been identiﬁed as part of the chromosome of different Gram-positive or Gram-negative microorganisms [50,75–77]. Exponential growth of the Qnr-related genes described has led to a proposal to bring order to the current nomenclature of these genes (for more information see ). In addition, a repository electronic database (http://www.lahey.org/qnrStudies) has been proposed to maintain order in the nomenclature of the currently described and future newly detected Qnr determinants. Despite this proposal, a high number of complete or partial qnr genes are present in GenBank with a very confused and non-standard nomenclature. As mentioned previously, some proteins showing homology with Qnr proteins, able to confer low levels of quinolone resistance QnrB2 ABO93588 QnrB20 QnrB13 QnrB24 QnrB29 QnrB23 QnrB30 QnrB15 QnrB14 QnrB32 QnrB9 QnrB7 QnrB41 QnrB16 QnrB42 QnrB1 QnrB6 QnrB3 QnrB18 QnrB17 QnrB31 QnrB19 QnrB5 QnrB10 QnrB36 QnrB40 QnrB28 QnrB33 QnrB27 QnrB8 QnrB21 QnrB25 QnrB35 QnrB38 QnrB4 QnrB22 QnrB37 QnrB12 QnrB11 QnrB34 QnrD QnrA4 QnrA3 QnrA5 QnrA6 QnrA7 QnrA1 QnrA2 QnrS3 QnrS1 QnrS4 QnrS5 AEG74318 QnrS2 QnrC ZP 05945497 QnrVC1 QnrVC3 orf A.baumannii EGQ95960.1 QnrVC4 AEM62764.1 0.05 Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationship amongst the qnr genes. Six qnr gene families have been included in the phylogenetic tree, including qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, qnrC, qnrD and qnrVC. The selected sequences for qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, qnrC and qnrD are those present on the webpage http://www.lahey.org/qnrStudies in which a GenBank accession no. is indicated. In addition, the protein sequences ABO93588 (QnrB-like) and AEG47318 (QnrS-like), both present in GenBank fulﬁlling the criteria deﬁned by Jacoby et al. , have been added. In addition, seven protein sequences present in GenBank have been selected related to qnrVC1 following the aforementioned criteria. The distancebased tree was generated using p-distance with the neighbour-joining method with MEGA version . J. Ruiz et al. / International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40 (2012) 196–203 when cloned in E. coli or other bacteria, have been identiﬁed within the chromophore of either Gram-positive or Gram-negative microorganisms [76–80], the latter mainly associated with aquatic environments. In addition, qnr-like genes have been detected during the course of metagenomic studies . It has been proposed that some Qnr family proteins derived from chromosomal ancestors present in waterborne Gram-negative microorganisms such as Shewanellaceae or Vibrionaceae [76–79]. In fact, four chromosomally encoded proteins of Shewanella algae and one of Shewanella putrefaciens present >70% homology with members of the QnrA family [50,77], thereby being considered as QnrA family members (QnrA2, S. putrefaciens; and QnrA3, QnrA4, QnrA5 and QnrA7, S. algae). To date, QnrA2 and QnrA3 have also been detected within plasmids in other microorganisms such as Klebsiella oxytoca or Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolates . QnrC presents an amino acid similarity with VcQnr1 (QnrVC1) of >70%, which might allow these Qnr proteins to be classiﬁed within a common family as different alleles of the same gene , suggesting their possible origin from an ancestor of the Vibrionaceae family . Finally, Vibrio splendidus has been proposed as one of the origins of the QnrS-like proteins . QnrB-related proteins have also been detected in seawater metagenome analysis, and chromosomally encoded in S. maltophilia as well as in some Enterobacteriaceae such as Serratia proteamaculans, Serratia marcescens or Citrobacter spp. [41,81,83,84], this latter genus being proposed as the original source of QnrB proteins . The high similarity between QnrD and QnrB-related proteins suggests that the aforementioned chromosomally encoded QnrB-related proteins might also possess a close phylogenetic relationship with QnrD. Finally, at present no Grampositive plasmid-derived qnr gene family has been described. A high intraspecies variability has been detected amongst SmQnr of S. maltophilia [41,85–87]. At least 47 different alleles are currently present in GenBank, and an Internet repository (http:// www.icms.qmul.ac.uk/centres/immunologyandinfectiousdisease/ Smqnr%20Web%20v2.htm) has been proposed to bring order to the speciﬁc nomenclature of these alleles . On studying the VPQnr, a chromosomally encoded Qnr-like protein of Vibrio parahaemolyticus (formerly VPA0095), Saga et al.  showed that a single substitution (C115 → Y) was able to produce a signiﬁcant increase in quinolone resistance levels when cloned and expressed in E. coli. Similar results have been published regarding different MIC levels of quinolones that appear to be associated with the presence of allelic variants of the SmQnr . Following this evidence, some authors have analysed the effect of point mutations in members of the QnrA, QnrB, QnrC and QnrS families [88–90], showing the presence of speciﬁc amino acid substitutions or deletions resulting in partial or full loss of activity of the Qnr proteins (Table 3). Although most of these alterations are not located within loop A or loop B, this loss of activity of Qnr proteins has been associated with alterations in hydrophobicity and protein conformation . On the other hand, it was observed that the QnrS1 substitution D185 → Y conferred slightly higher levels of resistance than parental proteins [i.e. four-fold for CIP, moxiﬂoxacin (MOX) and levoﬂoxacin (LVX)], demonstrating the potential risk of possible future in vivo selection of more active Qnr proteins. However, the aforementioned possible inverse relationship between protection level and viability should be taken into account as a possible limitation to this selection . Qnr determinants have been related to an enhanced facility to develop full resistance to quinolones [21,29], in agreement with the fact that decreased resistance levels to FQs favour the acquisition of full resistance to these agents . However, it has been reported that despite this enhanced facility to develop higher levels of quinolone resistance, E. coli isolates harbouring a qnr determinant present a low selection of topoisomerase mutations . The 199 Table 3 Single amino acid substitutions negatively affecting the activity of Qnr proteins. Positiona Wt 13 38c 56 72 92c 96 97 114 115c 116 117 153 159 185d 188 F L G C C G A F C S A S L D D Qnr activityb QnrA1 QnrB1 S P , D Y Y D , E Y Y D QnrC1 QnrS1 R Y , D Y Y D Y D D Y D C, V P C, V P D D Y D V a Numbering refers to QnrA1, QnrC1 and QnrS1 positions. QnrB1 transcription starts three amino acids later, thus it is necessary to subtract three from all positions stated in the ﬁrst column (i.e. G56 in QnrA corresponds to G53 in QnrB1). b Only considering those substitutions affecting more than 4-fold the activity of the Qnr proteins. c Other alterations described in the same position do not result in loss or gain of activity (i.e. QnrA1, L38F, C92S, C115S; QnrC1, L38A). d The same amino acid substitution in QnrS1 results in enhanced activity. authors suggest that this phenomenon might be related to both the action of the Qnr proteins, making it difﬁcult for quinolones to interact with their speciﬁc targets, and the presence of other mechanisms of resistance that might be selected in qnr-carrying isolates. It should be taken into account that in the aforementioned study, the antibiotic concentration present in the selective plates used to obtain the mutants was established according to the MIC of the microorganisms, thereby being signiﬁcantly higher (>10-fold) in the plates in which isolates carrying qnr genes were analysed . In fact, the same authors noted that the MPC of the selected FQ was even higher in strains carrying a qnr gene (range of MPC of CIP, 2–4 mg/L; range of MPC of MOX, 2–8 mg/L) than in those not carrying the gene (MPC of CIP, 0.12 mg/L; MPC of MOX, 0.5 mg/L). These MPC values of the strains carrying a qnr gene were higher than the antibiotic concentrations that might be reached in serum following a therapeutic dose , showing the relevance of these genes in clinical practice. 3.2. Enzymatic inactivation Enzymatic inactivation of quinolones, although observed in some fungi several years ago , was not an established phenomenon in bacteria until 2006. Thus, although ﬁrst detected in 2003 during a study of TMQR in E. coli , it was not until 2006 that it was deﬁnitively established that an aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme, a variant of AAC(6 )-Ib named AAC(6 )-Ib-cr, conferred low-level resistance to some quinolones such as CIP and norﬂoxacin (NOR), retaining its ability to inactivate aminoglycosides . This AAC(6 )-Ib variant presented two amino acid substitutions (W102 → R and D179 → Y) related to the ability to inactivate the aforementioned quinolones by means of an N-acetylation of its piperazinyl amine . No effect of AAC(6 )-Ib-cr has been observed on quinolones with an unsubstituted piperazinyl group. The interaction between AAC(6 )-Ib-cr and its substrates differs according to whether they are aminoglycosides or FQs . When this enzyme acts on aminoglycosides, the interactions between AAC(6 )-Ib-cr and these antimicrobial agents are made by numerous hydrogen-bonding interactions. However, when acting on quinolones, the interactions appear to be related to several stacking interactions. A difference has been established in the optimum pH 200 J. Ruiz et al. / International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40 (2012) 196–203 Table 4 Characteristics of plasmid-encoded efﬂux pumps. Efﬂux pump Speciesa Quinolones b OqxAB QepA1 QepA2 pRSB101h QacBIII Escherichia coli E. coli E. coli N/I Staphylococcus aureus Inhibitable rmtBd Ince Yearf Ref. N/I CCCP, NMR, PA␤N N/Ig N/I N/I Yes Yes No No N/I IncX1 IncFI IncFI N/I N/I 2003 2007 2008 2004 2010 [106,107] [102,104]    c Substrates Non-substrates NAL, FMQ, CIP, NOR CIP, NOR CIP, NOR NAL, NOR NOR, CIP N/I NAL, MOX, LVX, PFLX, SPFX, GFLX NAL, OFX, MOX, LVX, PFLX, GFLX N/I LVX NAL, nalidixic acid; FMQ, ﬂumequine; CIP, ciproﬂoxacin; NOR, norﬂoxacin; MOX, moxiﬂoxacin; LVX, levoﬂoxacin; PFLX, peﬂoxacin; SPFX, sparﬂoxacin; GFLX, gatiﬂoxacin; OFX, oﬂoxacin; N/I, no information; CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; NMR, 1-(1-naphtylmethyl)-piperazine; PA␤N, Phe-Arg-␤-naphthylamide. a Species in which the efﬂux pump has been detected. b Quinolones in which this information is available and in which the described effect is >2-fold. c Quinolones in which this information is available and in which the described effect is ≤2-fold. d Presence of the rmtB gene within the same plasmid. e Incompatibility group of the plasmid in which the efﬂux pump gene has been described. f First description. g Although no information is available, it is predicted that it will act similar to QepA1. h Efﬂux pump located within pRSB101 plasmid that has not yet received a formal name. levels for the activity of AAC(6 )-Ib-cr according to its substrates. Thus, the optimum pH for the activity of AAC(6 )-Ib-cr when it acts on aminoglycosides is 6.1, whereas it is 7.7 when acting on FQs . Analysis of the two amino acid substitutions by themselves showed that the single presence of the D179 → Y substitution appears to confer a slight increase in CIP resistance level (less than that present in isolates presenting both substitutions) . The main role of the substitution at position 179 has been conﬁrmed by mechanistic studies . Thus, Y179 would be involved in an increase in the afﬁnity of AAC(6 )-Ib-cr for FQs, interacting with them, whilst R102 plays a role as a stabiliser of the interactions. Another proposed interaction model has also suggested a direct role in the interactions between Y179 and FQs, whilst involving the R102 in an interaction with the ﬂuoroquinolone carboxylate . AAC(6 )-Ib-cr has been described worldwide, either plasmid or chromosomally encoded [26,37,48,95], including farm animal  and environmental microorganisms , showing its great potential to be disseminated. Moreover, it is possible that further adaptations of this or other enzymes able to modify antibacterial agents would be more efﬁcient as a mechanism of quinolone resistance. 3.3. Slow growth In some microorganisms such as E. coli, slow growth has been related to alterations in quinolone activity . Although the most frequent reports of this phenomenon have been observed when the microorganisms are grown in minimal medium or in the presence of speciﬁc mutations in the promoter region of the topoisomerase IV-encoding genes [19,25], some plasmids affecting the duplication rates may affect microorganism susceptibility levels. In 1996, it was described that the presence of the plasmid pKM101, belonging to the IncN incompatibility group and used in the Ames test , results in higher survival rates of E. coli grown in minimal medium in the presence of CIP . The authors disregarded the possible role of the mucAB genes, involved in the error-prone repair of DNA, as being responsible for these enhanced survival rates and the presence of a slow-growth phenotype. This slow-growth phenotype was associated with a 2.2 kb region of the plasmid containing the korB, traL, korA and traM genes and was suppressed (as were higher survival rates) in minimal medium in the presence of adenine and hypoxanthine. Curiously, in starvation conditions, E. coli strains carrying the pKM101 plasmid showed lower rates of survival in the presence of CIP. The authors hypothesised about the role of the region between the korB and korA genes, but the exact mechanism of action remains unknown. Although this slow-growth phenotype (resulting in small-colony formation) has been described by other authors , no other report has been found in the literature to provide more accurate information. 3.4. Plasmid-encoded efﬂux pumps Efﬂux pumps are a well-established quinolone resistance mechanism . Different families of efﬂux pumps are able to pump out quinolones possessing different afﬁnities, affecting in a different manner the corresponding ﬁnal MIC levels and thus having different clinical relevance . Although usually encoded in the bacterial chromophore, a few different plasmid-encoded efﬂux pumps able to pump out quinolones have been described (Tables 2 and 4) [100–104]. Interestingly, most of the plasmids carrying these efﬂux pumps have a close relationship with the farm world, suggesting that present or past use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary practice may not be excluded as a possible selection factor, and the association between these efﬂux pumps and the presence of the rmtB gene, encoding an unusual mechanism of resistance (target methylation) to aminoglycosides, is frequent [28,105]. OqxAB is a member of the resistance–nodulation–cell division (RND) family of multidrug efﬂux pumps , encoded on pOLA52, a plasmid belonging to the IncX1 incompatibility group, possessing a high similarity (99%) with a putative chromosomally encoded efﬂux pump system of K. pneumoniae (GenBank accession nos. ABR 76475 and ABR 76476). Although ﬁrst described in farm animals as involved in the development of resistance to olaquindox, a quinoxaline-di-N-oxide used as a growth promoter in pigs , it has been detected in humans both in pathogenic and commensal microorganisms, with its presence amongst farm workers in China being of note [107,108]. Further studies have shown that OqxAB is able to pump out NAL, ﬂumequine, CIP and NOR, increasing the MICs to these agents 8-, 32-, 32- and 64-fold, respectively . No information on its effect against other quinolones has been reported. On studying plasmids recovered from a wastewater bacterial community, Szczepanowski et al.  described within a plasmid (pRSB101) the presence of a tripartite multidrug efﬂux pump composed by a transcriptional regulator and a membrane fusion protein belonging to an RND-type efﬂux system with homology of ca. 40% to a putative efﬂux system of Geobacter sulfurreducens (GenBank accession nos. NP 952005 and NP 952003) and a permease and an ATPase belonging to an ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-type efﬂux pump also presenting great homology (59% and 45%, respectively) with the same G. sulfurreducens system (GenBank accession J. Ruiz et al. / International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40 (2012) 196–203 nos. N 95002 and N 952001). This system lacks an outer membrane component (downstream from the ﬁrst gene of the system, only the 3 -end region of an oprM-related gene remains). Thus, the authors hypothesised that this system is completed by a heterologous host-encoded outer membrane protein. Although no analysis of the possible presence of quinolone target alterations was performed, when the vector was cloned into E. coli the MICs of NAL and CIP were 80 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L, respectively, and when the efﬂux system was subcloned into a pBluescript-II-KS, the MICs of NAL and CIP rose to 550 mg/L and 1.25 mg/L, respectively. QepA1 (from quinolone efﬂux pump) was described in 2007, encoded within a conjugative plasmid present in E. coli clinical isolates [102,104]. The qepA1 gene was carried on an IncF1 plasmid (pIP1206) possessing high homology with pRSB107, a plasmid isolated from a sewage treatment plant together with the aforementioned pRSB101 . The qepA1 gene encodes a 14-transmembrane segment (14TMS) proton-dependent efﬂux pump belonging to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) , inhibitable by the presence of different efﬂux pump inhibitors, with hydrophilic quinolones such as CIP and NOR as substrates, but with a slight or no effect on more hydrophobic quinolones such as NAL, LVX or MOX, amongst others (Table 4), or different unrelated antimicrobial agents such as erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline or rifampicin. Thus, when transferred to E. coli, an increase from 2fold (NAL, sparﬂoxacin, lomeﬂoxacin) to 64-fold (CIP) is produced in the MICs of different quinolones [102,104]. However, as with other TMQRs, by itself its effect on the susceptibility levels of the affected quinolones is below the established resistance breakpoints. Although on analysing the G + C content (72%) of the qepA1 gene, the actinomycetes group has been suggested as the original source of this gene, at present the origin of this efﬂux pump currently remains unknown . QepA2, another QepA-like efﬂux pump, that has been described in a mobilisable non-conjugative plasmid of 90 kb (pQep) belonging to the IncF1 incompatibility group , differs in 2 of the 511 amino acids with respect to QepA1, presenting Gly in position 99 and Ile in position 134. Despite these differences, the spectrum of QepA2 substrates (hydrophilic quinolones) is similar to that of QepA1. The main differences between QepA1 and QepA2 lie in their genetic environment. Thus, whilst the rmtB gene is located within the same plasmid as the qepA1 gene, it remains absent in the plasmid that carries the qepA2 gene . Another difference is the presence of qepA2 located between two copies of the ISCR3C element, instead of an association with IS26 elements that has been related to QepA1. It has been proposed that this ISCR-like element is involved in the processes of mobilisation of the qepA2 gene . QepA1 and QepA2 probably act as a factor favouring the development of full resistance to CIP or NOR, increasing the frequency of selection of resistant mutants. However, their lack of effect over other quinolones probably does not affect their speciﬁc ability to select resistant mutants. Although the prevalence of the QepA-like efﬂux pumps appears to be very low, with different survey studies reporting frequencies ranging from 0.3% to 0.8% [100–112], higher frequencies have been reported in samples from animal origins . None the less, the real relevance and extension of these efﬂux pumps remains unknown, requiring lengthy studies to obtain valid conclusions. Plasmid-encoded efﬂux pumps able to extrude quinolones have also been described in S. aureus . Thus, on analysing the variability of the plasmid-encoded efﬂux pumps QacA and QacB, two 14-TMS proton-dependent efﬂux pumps belonging to the MFS family , amongst meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), it was observed that a speciﬁc allele of QacB (QacBIII) was able to pump out CIP and NOR but not LVX. Mutagenesis studies showed that this ability was related to the presence of a speciﬁc glutamic acid 201 at position 320. In addition, these results also suggest a possible slight effect of QacA on the MIC of the same quinolones. Further studies to evaluate its effect on other quinolones and to identify other possible alleles of QacA/QacB able to extrude quinolones are needed. 3.5. Natural transformation Acquisition of quinolone resistance mediated by natural transformation of DNA fragments of gyrA or parC genes carrying amino acid substitutions in the quinolone resistance-related positions has been described in different species of the genus Streptococcus, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, different viridans streptococci, Streptococcus dysgalactiae or Streptococcus pyogenes [114–116]. In vitro studies have shown that resistance could be transferred either from DNA from viridans streptococci to S. pneumoniae or vice versa, as well as amongst S. dysgalactiae and S. pyogenes. The frequencies of transformation ranged from 10−3 to <10−7 in correlation with the homologies of their quinolone resistancedetermining regions (QRDRs). The relevance of this mechanism of resistance both lies in the speciﬁc frequencies of transformation as well as in the incidence of quinolone resistance amongst donor isolates. 4. Concluding remarks Currently, TMQRs are extensively described around the world. Although they usually result in only a slight increase in the MICs of quinolones, their effect is additive and their presence may facilitate the development of full quinolone resistance. Furthermore, possible speciﬁc substitutions may enhance their activity. The emergence of new related genes may continue in the next years, whilst the possible adaptation of other enzymes, similar to what occurred with AAC(6 )-Ib, is a potential risk. Acknowledgments The logistic support of Laura Puyol and Diana Barrios is acknowledged. Funding: JR has a Miguel Servet Fellowship (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain). Competing interests: None declared. Ethical approval: Not required. References  Lesher GY, Froelich EJ, Gruett MD, Bailey JH, Brundage RP. 1,8-Naphthyridine derivatives. A new class of chemotherapeutic agents. J Med Pharm Chem 1962;91:1063–5.  Mitscher LA. Bacterial topoisomerase inhibitors: quinolone and pyridone antibacterial agents. Chem Rev 2005;105:559–92.  Blum MD, Graham DJ, McCloskey CA. Temaﬂoxacin syndrome: review of 95 cases. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18:946–50.  Matthews MR, Caruso DM, Phillips BJ, Csontos LG. Fulminant toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by trovaﬂoxacin. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2225.  Norrby SR, Lietman PL. Safety and tolerability of ﬂuoroquinolones. Drugs 1993;45(Suppl. 3):59–64.  Acar JF, Goldstein FW. Trends in bacterial resistance to ﬂuoroquinolones. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24(Suppl. 1):S67–73. ˜ J, Ruiz J, Carmona F, Nadal A, Gascón J. Salmonella  Alonso D, Munoz ovarian abscess following travel diarrhoea episode. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:551–3.  Davis R, Markham A, Balfour JA. Ciproﬂoxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efﬁcacy and tolerability. Drugs 1996;51:1019–74.  Ruiz J, Marco F, Oliveira I, Vila J, Gascón J. Trends in antimicrobial resistance levels among Campylobacter spp. causing traveler’s diarrhea. APMIS 2007;115:218–24.  Anquetin G, Greiner J, Mahmoudi N, Santillana-Hayat M, Gozalbes R, Farhati K, et al. Design, synthesis and activity against Toxoplasma gondii, Plasmodium spp., and Mycobacterium tuberculosis of new 6-ﬂuoroquinolones. Eur J Med Chem 2006;41:1478–93. 202 J. Ruiz et al. / International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40 (2012) 196–203  Romero IC, Saravia NG, Walker J. Selective action of ﬂuoroquinolones against intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis in vitro. J Parasitol 2005;91:1474–9.  Pommier Y, Leo E, Zhang HL, Marchand C. DNA topoisomerases and their poisoning by anticancer and antibacterial drugs. Chem Biol 2010;17: 421–33.  Endtz HP, Ruijs GJ, van Klingeren B, Jansen WH, van der Reyden T, Mouton RP. Quinolone resistance in Campylobacter isolated from man and poultry following the introduction of ﬂuoroquinolones in veterinary medicine. J Antimicrob Chemother 1991;27:199–208.  Millanao A, Barrientos H, Gomez C, Tomova A, Buschmann A, Dölz H, et al. Injudicious and excessive use of antibiotics: public health and salmon aquaculture in Chile. Rev Med Chil 2009;139:107–18 [in Spanish].  Collignon P, Powers JH, Chiller TM, Aidare-Kane A, Aarestrup FM. World Health Organization ranking of antimicrobials according to their importance in human medicine: a critical step for developing risk management strategies for the use of antimicrobials in food production animals. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:132–41.  Mensa L, Marco F, Vila J, Gascón J, Ruiz J. Quinolone resistance among Shigella spp. isolated from travellers returning from India. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008;14:279–81.  Le Hello S, Hendriksen RS, Doublet B, Fisher I, Nielsen EM, Whichard JM, et al. International spread of an epidemic population of Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198 resistant to ciproﬂoxacin. J Infect Dis 2011;204:675–84.  Ruiz J. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation and DNA gyrase protection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51:1109–17.  Ince D, Hooper DC. Quinolone resistance due to reduced target enzyme expression. J Bacteriol 2003;185:6883–92.  Courvalin P. Plasmid-mediated 4-quinolone resistance: a real or apparent absence? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990;34:681–4.  Martínez-Martínez L, Pascual A, Jacoby GA. Quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid. Lancet 1998;351:797–9.  Clerch B, Rivera E, Llagostera M. Identiﬁcation of a pKM101 region which confers a slow growth rate and interferes with susceptibility to quinolone in Escherichia coli AB1157. J Bacteriol 1996;178:5568–72.  Munshi MH, Sack DA, Haider K, Ahmed ZU, Rahaman MM, Morshed MG. Plasmid-mediated resistance to nalidixic acid in Shigella dysenteriae type 1. Lancet 1987;2:419–21.  Panhotra BR, Desai B, Sharma PL. Nalidixic-acid-resistant Shigella dysenteriae I. Lancet 1985;1:763.  Dalhoff A, Matutat S, Ullmann U. Effect of quinolones against slowly growing bacteria. Chemotherapy 1995;41:92–9.  Ruiz E, Sáenz Y, Zarazaga M, Rocha-Gracia R, Martínez-Martínez L, Arlet G, et al. qnr, aac(6 )-Ib-cr and qepA genes in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.: genetic environments and plasmid and chromosomal location. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:886–97.  Robicsek A, Strahilevitz J, Jacoby GA, Macielag M, Abbanat D, Park CH, et al. Fluoroquinolone-modifying enzyme: a new adaptation of a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Nat Med 2006;12:83–8.  Liu JH, Deng YT, Zeng ZL, Gao JH, Chen L, Arakawa Y, et al. Coprevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants QepA, Qnr, and AAC(6 )-Ib-cr among 16S rRNA methylase RmtB-producing Escherichia coli isolates from pigs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52: 2992–3.  Briales A, Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Velasco C, Díaz de Alba P, DomínguezHerrera J, Pachón J, et al. In vitro effect of qnrA1, qnrB1, and qnrS1 genes on ﬂuoroquinolone activity against isogenic Escherichia coli isolates with mutations in gyrA and parC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55: 1266–9.  Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Velasco C, Pascual A, García I, Martínez-Martínez L. Correlation of quinolone resistance levels and differences in basal and quinolone-induced expression from three qnrA-containing plasmids. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:440–5.  Hegde SS, Vetting MW, Mitchenall LA, Maxwell A, Blanchard JS. Structural and biochemical analysis of the pentapeptide repeat protein EfsQnr, a potent DNA gyrase inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:110–7.  Ruiz J, Gómez J, Navia MM, Ribera A, Sierra JM, Marco F, et al. High prevalence of nalidixic acid resistant, ciproﬂoxacin susceptible phenotype among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;42:257–61.  Wain J, Hoa NT, Chinh NT, Vinh H, Everett MJ, Diep TS, et al. Quinoloneresistant Salmonella typhi in Viet Nam: molecular basis of resistance and clinical response to treatment. Clin Infect Dis 1997;25:1404–10.  Cesaro A, Bettoni RRD, Lascols C, Mérens A, Soussy CJ, Cambau E. Low selection of topoisomerase mutants from strains of Escherichia coli harbouring plasmidborne qnr genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:1007–15.  Sato T, Yokota S, Uchida I, Okubo T, Ishihara K, Fujii N, et al. A ﬂuoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolate without quinolone resistance-determining region mutations found in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:3964–5.  Gunell M, Webber MA, Kotilainen P, Lilly A, Caddick JM, Jalava J, et al. Mechanisms of resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica strains exhibiting a nonclassical quinolone resistance phenotype. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:3832–6.  de Toro M, Rojo-Bezares B, Vinué L, Undabeitia E, Torres C, Sáenz Y. In vivo selection of aac(6 )-Ib-cr and mutations in the gyrA gene in a clinical qnrS1positive Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104B strain recovered after ﬂuoroquinolone treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:1945–9.  Ribera A, Doménech-Sanchez A, Ruiz J, Benedi VJ, Jimenez de Anta MT, Vila J. Mutations in gyrA and parC QRDRs are not relevant for quinolone resistance in epidemiological unrelated Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates. Microb Drug Resist 2002;8:245–51.  Alonso A, Martínez JL. Cloning and characterization of SmeDEF, a novel multidrug efﬂux pump of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:3079–86.  Ribera A, Jurado A, Ruiz J, Marco F, del Valle O, Mensa J, et al. In vitro activity of clinaﬂoxacin in comparison with other quinolones against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates in the presence and absence of reserpine. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;42:123–8.  Sánchez MB, Hernández A, Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Martínez-Martínez L, Martínez JL. Predictive analysis of transmissible quinolone resistance indicates Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as potential source of a novel family of Qnr determinants. BMC Microbiol 2008;8:148.  Ahmed AM, Motoi Y, Sato M, Maruyama A, Watanabe H, Fukumoto Y, et al. Zoo animals as reservoirs of Gram-negative bacteria harboring integrons and antimicrobial resistance genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:6686–90.  Guo L, Zhang J, Xu C, Zhao Y, Ren T, Zhang B, et al. Molecular characterization of ﬂuoroquinolone resistance in Haemophilus parasuis isolated from pigs in South China. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:539–42.  Nakaminami H, Noguchi N, Sasatsu M. Fluoroquinolone efﬂux by the plasmidmediated multidrug efﬂux pump QacB variant QacBIII in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:4107–11.  Tran QT, Nawaz MS, Deck J, Nguyen KT, Cerniglia CE. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Pseudomonas putida isolates from imported shrimp. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:1885–7.  Xia R, Guo X, Zhang Y, Xu H. qnrVC-like gene located in a novel complex class 1 integron harboring the ISCR1 element in an Aeromonas punctata strain from an aquatic environment in Shandong Province, China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:3471–4.  Jacoby GA, Gacharna N, Black TA, Miller GH, Hooper DC. Temporal appearance of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:1665–6.  Warburg G, Korem M, Robicsek A, Engelstein E, Moses AE, Block C, et al. Changes in aac(6 )-Ib-cr prevalence and ﬂuoroquinolone resistance in nosocomial isolates of Escherichia coli collected from 1991 through 2005. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:1268–70.  Tran JH, Jacoby GA. Mechanism of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:5638–42.  Jacoby G, Cattoir V, Hooper D, Martínez-Martínez L, Nordmann P, Pascual A, et al. qnr gene nomenclature. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:2297–9.  Quiroga MP, Andres P, Petroni A, Soler-Bistué AJC, Guerriero L, Vargas LJ, et al. Complex class 1 integrons with diverse variable regions, including aac(6 )-Ibcr, and a novel allele, qnrB10, associated with ISCR1 in clinical enterobacterial isolates from Argentina. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:4466–70.  Jacoby GA, Chow N, Waites KB. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:559–62.  Minarini LAR, Poirel L, Cattoir V, Darini ALC, Nordmann P. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants among enterobacterial isolates from outpatients in Brazil. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;62:474–8.  Robicsek A, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. The worldwide emergence of plasmidmediated quinolone resistance. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6:629–40.  Wang M, Tran JH, Jacoby GA, Zhang Y, Wang F, Hooper DC. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from Shanghai, China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:2242–8.  Vetting MW, Hegde SS, Fajardo JE, Fiser A, Roderick SL, Takiff HE, et al. Pentapeptide repeat proteins. Biochemistry 2006;45:1–10.  Ellington MJ, Woodford N. Fluoroquinolone resistance and plasmid addiction systems: self-imposed selection pressure? J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57:1026–9.  Garrido MC, Herrero M, Kolter R, Moreno F. The export of the DNA replication inhibitor microcin B17 provides immunity for the host cell. EMBO J 1988;7:1853–62.  Montero C, Mateu G, Rodriguez R, Takiff H. Intrinsic resistance of Mycobacterium smegmatis to ﬂuoroquinolones may be inﬂuenced by new pentapeptide protein MfpA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:3387–92.  Chatterji M, Nagaraja V. GyrI: a counter-defensive strategy against proteinaceous inhibitors of DNA gyrase. EMBO Rep 2002;3:261–7.  Chatterji M, Senqupta S, Nagaraja V. Chromosomally encoded gyrase inhibitor GyrI protects Escherichia coli against DNA-damaging agents. Arch Microbiol 2003;180:339–46.  Tran JH, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. Interaction of the plasmid-encoded quinolone resistance protein QnrA with Escherichia coli topoisomerase IV. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:3050–2.  Vetting MW, Hegde SS, Wang M, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC, Blanchard JS. Structure of QnrB1, a plasmid-mediated ﬂuoroquinolone resistance factor. J Biol Chem 2011;286:25265–73.  Xiong X, Bromley EH, Oelschlaeger P, Woolfson DN, Spencer J. Structural insights into quinolone antibiotic resistance mediated by pentapeptide repeat proteins: conserved surface loops direct the activity of a Qnr protein from a Gram-negative bacterium. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:3917–27. J. Ruiz et al. / International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40 (2012) 196–203  Tran JH, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. Interaction of the plasmid-encoded quinolone resistance protein Qnr with Escherichia coli DNA gyrase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:118–25.  Hegde SS, Vetting MW, Roderick SL, Mitchenall LA, Maxwell A, Takiff HE, et al. A ﬂuoroquinolone resistance protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis that mimics DNA. Science 2005;308:1480–3.  Kreuzer KN, Cozzarelli RN. Escherichia coli mutants thermosensitive for deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase subunit A: effects on deoxyribonucleic acid replication, transcription, and bacteriophage growth. J Bacteriol 1979;140:424–35.  Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011;28:2731–9.  Cavaco LM, Hasman H, Xia S, Aarestrup FM. qnrD, a novel gene conferring transferable quinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky and Bovismorbiﬁcans of human origin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:603–8.  Hata M, Suzuki M, Matsumoto M, Takahashi M, Sato K, Ibe S, et al. Cloning of a novel gene for quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid in Shigella ﬂexneri 2b. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:801–3.  Jacoby GA, Walsh KE, Mills DM, Walker VJ, Oh H, Robicsek A, et al. qnrB, another plasmid-mediated gene for quinolone resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:1178–82.  Wang M, Guo Q, Xu X, Wang X, Ye X, Wu S, et al. New plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance gene, qnrC, found in a clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:1892–7.  Fonseca EL, Dos Santos Freitas F, Vieira VV, Vicente ACP. New qnr gene cassettes associated with superintegron repeats in Vibrio cholerae O1. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14:1129–31.  Kim HB, Wang M, Ahmed S, Park CH, LaRocque RC, Faruque AS, et al. Transferable quinolone resistance in Vibrio cholerae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:799–803.  Hjerde E, Lorentzen MS, Holden MT, Seeger K, Paulsen S, Bason N, et al. The genome sequence of the ﬁsh pathogen Aliivibrio salmonicida strain LFI1238 shows extensive evidence of gene decay. BMC Genomics 2008;9:616.  Poirel L, Liard A, Rodriguez-Martinez JM, Nordmann P. Vibrionaceae as a possible source of Qnr-like quinolone resistance determinants. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:1118–21.  Poirel L, Rodriguez-Martinez JM, Mammeri H, Liard A, Nordmann P. Origin of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant QnrA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:3523–5.  Cattoir V, Poirel L, Mazel D, Soussy CJ, Nordmann P. Vibrio splendidus as the source of plasmid-mediated QnrS-like quinolone resistance determinants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:2650–1.  Saga T, Kaku M, Onodera Y, Yamachika S, Sato K, Takase H. Vibrio parahaemolyticus chromosomal qnr homologue VPA0095: demonstration by transformation with a mutated gene of its potential to reduce quinolone susceptibility in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49: 2144–5.  Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Velasco C, Briales A, García I, Conejo MC, Pascual A. Qnr-like pentapeptide repeat proteins in Gram-positive bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:1240–3.  Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, Halpern AL, Rusch D, Eisen JA, et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 2004;304:67–74.  Cheung TK, Chu YW, Chu MY, Ma CH, Yung RW, Kam KM. Plasmidmediated resistance to ciproﬂoxacin and cefotaxime in clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in Hong Kong. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:586–9.  Velasco C, Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Briales A, Díaz de Alba P, Calvo J, Pascual A. Smaqnr, a new chromosome-encoded quinolone resistance determinant in Serratia marcescens. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:239–42.  Jacoby GA, Grifﬁn C, Hooper DC. Citrobacter spp. as a source of qnrB alleles. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:4979–84.  Gordon NC, Wareham DW. Novel variants of the Smqnr family of quinolone resistance genes in clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:483–9.  Shimizu K, Kikuchi K, Sasaki T, Takahashi N, Ohtsuka M, Ono Y, et al. Smqnr, a new chromosome-carried quinolone resistance gene in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:3823–5.  Wareham DW, Gordon NC, Shimizu K. Two new variants of and creation of a repository for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia quinolone protection protein (Smqnr) genes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011;37:89–90.  Cattoir V, Poirel L, Nordmann P. In-vitro mutagenesis of qnrA and qnrS genes and quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007;13:940–3.  Guo Q, Weng J, Xu X, Wang M, Wang X, Ye X, et al. A mutational analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of quinolone resistance proteins QnrA1 and QnrC from Proteus mirabilis. BMC Struct Biol 2010;10:33.  Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Briales A, Velasco C, Conejo MC, Martínez-Martínez L, Pascual A. Mutational analysis of quinolone resistance in the plasmidencoded pentapeptide repeat proteins QnrA, QnrB and QnrS. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;63:1128–34.  Birmingham MC, Guarino R, Heller A, Wilton JH, Shah A, Hejmanowski L, et al. Ciproﬂoxacin concentrations in lung tissue following a simple 400 mg intravenous dose. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999;43(Suppl. A):43–8. 203  Martens R, Wetzstein HG, Zadrazil F, Capelari M, Hoffmann P, Schmeer N. Degradation of the ﬂuoroquinolone enroﬂoxacin by wood-rotting fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62:4206–9.  Vetting MW, Park CH, Hegde SS, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC, Blanchard JS. Mechanistic and structural analysis of aminoglycoside N-acetyltransferase AAC(6 )-Ib and its bifunctional, ﬂuoroquinolone-active AAC(6 )-Ib-cr variant. Biochemistry 2008;47:9825–35.  Maurice F, Broutin I, Podglajen I, Benas P, Collatz E, Dardel F. Enzyme structural plasticity and the emergence of broad-spectrum antibiotic resistance. EMBO Rep 2008;9:344–9.  Park CH, Robicsek A, Jacoby GA, Sahm D, Hooper DC. Prevalence in the United States of aac(6 )-Ib-cr encoding a ciproﬂoxacin-modifying enzyme. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:3953–5.  Jung CM, Heinze TM, Strakosha R, Elkins CA, Sutherland JB. Acetylation of ﬂuoroquinolone antimicrobial agents by an Escherichia coli strain isolated from a municipal wastewater treatment plant. J Appl Microbiol 2009;106: 564–71.  McCann J, Spingarn NE, Kobori J, Ames BN. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens: bacterial tester strains with R factor plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975;72:979–83.  Winans SC, Walker GC. Identiﬁcation of pKM101-encoded loci specifying potentially lethal gene products. J Bacteriol 1985;161:417–24.  Poole K. Efﬂux pumps as antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Ann Med 2007;39:162–76.  Cattoir V, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance pump QepA2 in an Escherichia coli isolate from France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:3801–4.  Hansen LH, Johannesen E, Burmølle M, Sørensen AH, Sørensen SJ. Plasmidencoded multidrug efﬂux pump conferring resistance to olaquindox in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:3332–7.  Périchon B, Courvalin P, Galimand M. Transferable resistance to aminoglycosides by methylation of G1405 in 16S rRNA and to hydrophilic ﬂuoroquinolones by QepA-mediated efﬂux in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:2464–9.  Szczepanowski R, Krahn I, Linke B, Goesmann A, Pülher A, Schlüter A. Antibiotic multiresistance plasmid pRSB101 isolated from a wastewater treatment plant is related to plasmids residing in phytopathogenic bacteria and carries eight different resistance determinants including a multidrug transport system. Microbiology 2004;150:3613–30.  Yamane K, Wachino JI, Suzuki S, Kimura K, Shibata N, Kato H, et al. New plasmid-mediated ﬂuoroquinolone efﬂux pump, QepA, found in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:3354–60.  Doi Y, Yokoyama K, Yamane K, Wachino J, Shibata N, Yagi T, et al. Plasmid-mediated 16S rRNA methylase in Serratia marcescens conferring high-level resistance to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:491–6.  Sørensen AH, Hansen LH, Johannesen E, Sørensen SJ. Conjugative plasmid conferring resistance to olaquindox. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:798–9.  Kim HB, Wang M, Park CH, Kim EC, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC. oqxAB encoding a multidrug efﬂux pump in human clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:3582–4.  Zhao J, Chen Z, Chen S, Deng Y, Liu Y, Tian W, et al. Prevalence and dissemination of oqxAB in Escherichia coli isolates from animals, farmworkers, and the environment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54: 4219–24.  Hansen LH, Jensen LB, Sørensen HI, Sørensen SJ. Substrate speciﬁcity of the OqxAB multidrug resistance pump in Escherichia coli and selected enteric bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:145–7.  Périchon B, Bogaerts P, Lambert T, Frangeul L, Courvalin P, Galimand M. Sequence of conjugative plasmid pIP1206 mediating resistance to aminoglycosides by 16S rRNA methylation and to hydrophilic ﬂuoroquinolones by efﬂux. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:2581–92.  Yamane K, Wachino JI, Suzuki S, Arakawa Y. Plasmid-mediated qepA gene among Escherichia coli clinical isolates from Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:1564–6.  Kim ES, Jeong JY, Choi SH, Lee SO, Kim SH, Kim MN, et al. Plasmid-mediated ﬂuoroquinolone efﬂux pump gene, qepA, in Escherichia coli clinical isolates in Korea. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;65:335–8.  Paulsen IT, Brown MH, Littlejohn TG, Mitchell BA, Skurray RA. Multidrug resistance proteins QacA and QacB from Staphylococcus aureus: membrane topology and identiﬁcation of residues involved in substrate speciﬁcity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:3630–5.  Duesberg CB, Malhotra-Kumar S, Goossens H, McGee L, Klugman KP, Welte T, et al. Interspecies recombination occurs frequently in quinolone resistancedetermining regions of clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:4191–3.  Janoir C, Podglajen I, Kitzis MD, Poyart C, Gutmann L. In vitro exchange of ﬂuoroquinolone resistance determinants between Streptococcus pneumoniae and viridans streptococci and genomic organization of the parE–parC region in S. mitis. J Infect Dis 1999;180:555–8. ˜ J, De La Campa AG. Horizontal trans Ferrándiz MJ, Fenoll A, Linares fer of parC and gyrA in ﬂuoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44: 840–7.
© Copyright 2018 ExploreDoc