Control Cable Terminal - Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Date :
Control Cable Terminal - Retirement
Issue :
30 January 2015
All aircraft flight control cable terminal fittings made from stainless steel
specification SAE-AISI 303 Se or SAE-AISI 304, installed on aircraft which are
not maintained in accordance with a maintenance program which was
developed using MSG-3 methodology.
The objective of this airworthiness bulletin (AWB) is to urge operators and
maintainers to consider replacing all control cables having terminal fittings
manufactured from stainless steel SAE-AISI 303Se or SAE-AISI 304 before
reaching 15 years total time in service.
CASA AD/GENERAL/87 mandates replacement of all primary flight control
assemblies (those used by the pilot for the immediate control of pitch, roll, and
yaw1). Whilst the AD mandates the replacement of the primary flight controls, it
is recommended that operators also consider replacement of the remaining
flight control cable assemblies.
In addition, operators and maintainers should consider inspecting control cable
terminals underneath any rubber sleeves or tape etc. which may be wrapped
around the terminal, for corrosion pitting/rust, irrespective of total time in
service, as described in section 4 of this AWB.
Reports of flight control cable terminal fitting separation failures continue to be
received in Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Failure of a flight
control cable terminal can result in loss of control.
Investigations have revealed that the failed terminals had been in service for
approximately 15 years or more and were identified by standard terminal fitting
part numbers AN669, MS21260 and NAS650.
It should be noted that these terminal fittings have been incorporated into flight
control cable assemblies which can then be identified by different
manufacturers part numbers in the aircraft Illustrated Parts Catalogue (IPC).
USA Federal Aviation Regulations Part 23.673 – Primary flight controls
Page 1 of 6
Date :
Control Cable Terminal - Retirement
Issue :
30 January 2015
Figure 1 - Separation at threaded end of terminal
Terminal fitting separation as described in this AWB is due to chloride stresscorrosion cracking (CSCC) a form of intergranular cracking which does not
provide clear visual clues to the full extent of the internal structural damage
and can originate from within the terminal (See Figure 4).
This means that even very small corrosion pits, cracks or rust deposits on the
surface of the terminal fitting may be indications that the terminal could be very
close to failure.
Figure 2 - Separation at swaged end of terminal
Reported failures in Australia include a terminal fitting in a wing and
another in the cabin, behind the instrument panel. Such locations are
generally considered to be free of water, battery gasses and engine
exhaust fumes, factors which can contribute to corrosion problems.
Periodic inspections to monitor growing rust and/or pitting deposits on the
terminal surface are not considered adequate to determine the continuing
serviceability of the terminal. In-flight failures indicate that, not only is the
initial pitting /cracking generally difficult to detect, but the extent of the
associated sub-surface corrosion is extremely difficult to assess and the
rate of crack propagation is unpredictable.
Page 2 of 6
Date :
Control Cable Terminal - Retirement
Issue :
30 January 2015
Figure 3 - Intergranular Corrosion Cracking
Adapted from: Corrosion DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93 SPECIALIZED CORROSION Rev. 0
CH-02 Page 33 Figure 14 Intergranular Corrosion Cracking.
While the sketch above (Figure 3) shows surface pitting as evidence of
intergranular corrosion, a corroded terminal may also show small rust
A formal investigation by the New Zealand Civil Aviation Authority into a
report of stainless steel control cable terminal corrosion, discovered
evidence of CSCC originating from the inside of the terminal. Since such
cracking can originate from within the terminal, external surface clues
such as pitting or cracking may not provide an adequate basis for
determining serviceability. This introduces the possibility that a terminal
may be close to failure and may even fail with little or no surface
Figure 4 - Internal corrosion - flight control terminal sleeve.
The crack shown in Figure 4 originates from the cable wires (on the left of
the picture) swaged in the terminal sleeve. The corrosion has not yet
reached the outside surface of the terminal sleeve.
Page 3 of 6
Date :
Control Cable Terminal - Retirement
Issue :
30 January 2015
Additional Causes of Corrosion
Corrosion has now been found under the rubber sleeves used for aircraft
manufacturer’s part number identification, as shown in Figure 5 & 6
below. During an inspection which detected corrosion on one section of a
terminal, the maintainer found additional corrosion at the edge and under
the rubber sleeve, when the sleeve was pulled back. Four flap control
cable terminals were affected. They had been in service for
approximately 13 years.
Corrosion at
rubber sleeve edge
Figure 5 - Control cable terminal covered in rubber sleeve (source ATSB).
Figure 6 - Control cable terminal shown in figure 5, with rubber sleeve
removed (source ATSB).
Stainless steel’s resistance to corrosion is primarily attributed to the
existence of a thin chromic oxide film which develops in the presence of
oxygen in the atmosphere. Stainless steel must be in continual contact
with oxygen in order to develop and maintain the integrity of the film. A
breakdown in an area of the oxide film due to lack of oxygen can allow
localised corrosion cells to form. The presence of the rubber sleeves over
the terminals prevented the chromic oxide film to form, allowing corrosion
to develop.
Page 4 of 6
Date :
Control Cable Terminal - Retirement
Issue :
30 January 2015
FAA Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) CE-02-05R1
“…..cracking and corrosion problems currently being experienced
with terminals made from SAE AIAI 303 Se stainless steel”.
FAA SAIB CE-11-01 Stabilizers - Horizontal Stabiliser - Turnbuckle
(Piper Aircraft Inc.)
National Transport Safety Board (NTSB) recommendations A-01-06
through A-01-008.
(iv) U.S. Department of Energy DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93 SPECIALIZED
FAA AC 43-13-1B chapter 7, section 8, paragraph 7.149d
(vi) NTSB Materials Laboratory Factual Report No. 10-108
(vii) ASM Handbook Committee 1975, Failure Analysis and Prevention,
Metals Handbook, 8th edn, Metals Park, Ohio
(viii) USA Federal Aviation Regulations Part 23.673 - Primary flight
(ix) CASA Airworthiness Directive AD/GENERAL/87 - Primary Flight
Control Cable Assembly Retirement
Although CASA AD/GENERAL/87 mandates replacement of primary flight
control cables after 15 years’ time in service, CASA recommends that
operators consider the following for all control cables:
Visually inspect control cable terminals, irrespective of the total time
in service, for the presence of any rubber sleeves, tape or any other
material/substance (other than lockwire) that may prevent the
chromic oxide film from forming. Such material should be removed
and the terminal cleaned and inspected for corrosion, particularly in
the area that was covered by the rubber sleeve or tape. Any sign of
corrosion is cause for rejection.
Retire flight control cable assembles with terminals made from
stainless steel (SAE-AISI 303Se and SAE-AISI 304) including, but
not limited to, terminals manufactured to MS20658 (AN658),
MS20667 (AN667), MS20668 (AN668), MS21259 (AN666) and
MS21260 (AN669 or NAS650), before reaching 15 years total time
in service.
Where required by aircraft maintenance documentation, flight
control cables should be periodically inspected in accordance with
the manufacturer's data and FAA AC 43-13-1B chapter 7, section 8,
paragraph 7.149d.
Page 5 of 6
Date :
Control Cable Terminal - Retirement
Issue :
30 January 2015
Enquiries with regard to the content of this Airworthiness Bulletin should
be made via the direct link e-mail address:
[email protected]
or in writing, to:
Airworthiness & Engineering Branch
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
GPO Box 2005, Canberra, ACT, 2601
Page 6 of 6