Effect of Sulfur Concentration and pH Conditions - USRA

46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2015)
A. Fox1, T.Peretyazhko2, B. Sutter2, P. Niles3,D.W. Ming3, and R.V. Morris3. 1Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47406 ([email protected]), 2Jacobs Engineering Technology and Science/NASA Johnson Space
Center, Houston, TX 77058), 3Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science, NASA-Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX
Introduction: The Chemistry and Mineralogy
Instrument (CHEMIN) on board the Mars Science
Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity Rover identified minor
amounts of akaganeite (β-FeOOH) at Yellowknife
Bay, Mars [1]. There is also evidence for akaganeite
at other localities on Mars from the Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars (CRISM)
[2]. Akaganeite is an iron(III) hydroxide with a hollandite-like structure and Cl in its tunnels [3]. Terrestrial akaganeite usually forms in Cl-rich environments under acidic, oxidizing conditions [4]. Previous
studies of akaganeite have revealed that akaganeite
formation is affected by the presence of sulfate
(hereafter denoted as S [5, 6]). The prediction of circumneutral pH coupled with the detection of S at Yellowknife Bay [7] dictate that work is needed to determine how S and pH together affect akaganeite
formation. The goal of this work is to study how
changes in both S concentration and pH influence
akaganeite precipitation. Akaganeite formation was
investigated at S/Cl molar ratios of 0, 0.017, 0.083,
0.17 and 0.33 at pH 1.5, 2, and 4. Results are anticipated to provide combined S concentration and pH
constraints on akaganeite formation in Yellowknife
Bay and elsewhere on Mars. Knowledge of solution
pH and S concentrations can be utilized in understanding microbial habitability potential on the Mar-
tian surface.
Materials and Methods: Synthesis Iron (III) precipitates were prepared by hydrolysis of 0.2M
FeCl3·6H2O (Sigma Aldrich. Reagent ≥99%).
Na2SO4·10H2O (Acros Organics, extra pure) was added to obtain S/Cl molar ratios of 0, 0.017, 0.083,
0.17, and 0.33. Three series of akaganeite syntheses
were performed. Series 1 was not pH adjusted and
had pH 1.5, series 2 was adjusted to pH 2±0.2 using
8M NaOH (ChemPure), and series 3 was adjusted to
pH 4±0.3 using 16M NaOH solution (Table 1). The
samples were heated at 90°C for 5 hours, then cooled
to room temperature.
The precipitates were
washed 3x with water by centrifugation and dried
for 24 hours at 70°C.
Characterization Powder XRD data were collected on a Panaylitical X’Pert Pro diffractometer with Co
Kα radiation. All samples were scanned from 480°2ϴ, with a step size of 0.02. Weight percents
were determined using the Rietveld refinement
method and the amount of amorphous material was
determined by the internal standard method (sample
mixed with 20 wt. % corundum).
Total chlorine in each synthesized material (Table
1) was measured by ion chromatography (IC) after dissolution of 50 mg sample in 5M HNO3 (Fisher Chemical) at 80°C for 1 hour. Milli-Q water was added to
Table 1: Summary of experimental results including: pH conditions, phases identified and total chlorine. AK-akaganeite, NJ-natrojarosite, GO- goethite, HEhematite, HA-halite, A-amorphous material. Samples are identified as S/Cl ratio-pH condition, for example, a sample with an S/Cl=0.017 and an initial pH of
1.5 is represented as S0.017-1.5. Estimated errors are ~10% of the amounts shown.
46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2015)
bring the volume to 100 mL. Chlorine concentration
was determined by a Dionex ICS-2000 RFIC Ion
Chromatography System.
Results and Discussion: Fe(III) precipitates.
XRD analyses of the samples prepared at pH 1.5
r e v e a l e d formation of akaganeite at S/Cl = 0,
0.017, 0.083, and 0.17 and natrojarosite
((Na0.67(H3O)0.33Fe3(SO4)2(OH)6) at S/Cl = 0.083,
0.17, and 0.33 (Table 1). Akaganeite was found at all
S/Cl ratios in samples prepared at pH 2. Natrojarosite was identified at S/Cl = 0.083, 0.17, and 0.33
and goethite (α-FeOOH) was found at S/Cl ≥0 (Table 1). Goethite in pH 2 samples could be formed
through Fe (III) hydrolysis and/or transformation of
less stable akaganeite to goethite [8].
Samples prepared at pH 4 did not yield akaganeite. Our results agree with previous work that constrained akaganeite synthesis to pH ≤2 [5]. All
samples appeared to contain a disordered material
characterized by the broad X-ray peaks. Hematite (αFe2O3) and halite (NaCl) were formed at S/Cl = 0
and 0.017 and goethite and halite were obtained at
S/Cl = 0.083, 0.17 and 0.33 (Table 1).
Crystallinity and Crystallite size. Samples prepared at pH 1.5 and 2 had broadening and intensity
loss of akaganeite peaks as S concentration and pH
increases. Peak broadening is a consequence of
small crystallite size and/or strain in the crystal
structure [9]. . Addition of S reduces the crystallinity of akaganeite and as S concentration increases,
particle size decreases and the crystals become irregularly shaped [6]. Cai et al demonstrated that pH
increase accelerated Fe (III) hydrolysis leading to
formation of less crystalline akaganeite [5].
Chlorine Content. Chlorine can occupy either
sites in the tunnels within the akaganeite structure or
surface sites. [10]. Samples prepared at initial pH 1.5
had between 6 and 40 mg/g Cl (Table 1). This is
slightly lower than the reported concentrations, which
fall between 10 and 70 mg/g Cl [7]. With the exception of S0-1.5, Cl content decreased as S concentration
increased. The decrease correlates with a decreased
amount of akaganeite being produced. The low Cl con
tent of S0-1.5 is likely the result of formation of
highly crystalline akaganeite with low surface area
and c o n s e q u e n t l y less surface sites available for
Cl complextion [6].
Samples prepared at pH 2 had between 6 and 87
mg/g Cl (Table 1). The higher Cl content than the
samples prepared at pH 1.5 is likely due to crystallinity
and size decrease and consequently surface area increase as initial pH changes from 1.5 to 2. Ishikawa et
al. observed an increase in surface area as crystallinity
decreased in akaganeite [6]. An increase in surface
area would allow for more Cl adsorption. Samples
prepared at pH 2 also showed a decrease in Cl as S
concentrations increased due to smaller akaganeite
amount in the samples, except S0.083-2, whose low Cl
content cannot be explained.
Samples prepared at pH 4 have between 38 and 86
mg/g Cl (Table 1). These samples do not contain akaganeite nor enough halite to explain t h e high
amounts of Cl. Therefore the majority of the Cl is likely contained in the amorphous material. The amorphous material is possibly an akaganeite-like phase [4]
but further analysis would be needed to ascertain the
nature of Cl in that material.
Conclusions: Both pH and S/Cl molar ratios were
found to affect mineralogy, crystallinity, and Cl content. Total Cl content of akaganeite was observed to
increase as crystallinity decreased, likely due to increased surface area allowing more Cl adsorption. Akaganeite did not form above pH 2, in agreement with
previous work [5]. At S/Cl ratios below 0.017 akaganeite is the only product at pH 1.5 and 2. Akaganeite
and other products form at S/Cl=0.083 and 0.17 at pH
1.5 and S/Cl=0.083, 0.17, and 0.33 at pH 2.
Conditions at Yellowknife Bay do not appear to
have been suitable for akaganeite formation. The
Cumberland (CB) S/Cl is 0.52 (correcting for pyrrohotite, FeS) and pH estimates for Yellowknife Bay are
near neutral [7], which are both too high for akaganeite
formation according to our experiments. This assumes
that all CB sulfur, excluding FeS sulfur, would have
been available in solution at the time of CB emplacement. Akaganeite, once formed, is stable at near neutral pH conditions [10], so it is possible Yellowknife
Bay akaganeite is detrital and was transported from a
distal location where a more acidic and Cl-rich environment allowed for its formation. Akaganeite may
have alternatively formed in Yellowknife Bay during a
separate event when geochemical conditions were
more acidic and Cl rich than the conditions that allowed for other CB minerals to form that require neutral pH conditions or higher S concentrations.
References: 1] Vaniman D. T. et al. (2014)
Science, 343 [2] Carter J. et al. (2014) LPS XLV,
2364 [3] Stahl K. et al. (2003) Corrosion Science,
45, 2563-2575. [4] Bibi I. et al. (2011) Geochimica
et Cosmochimica Acta, 75, 6429–6438. [5] Cai J. et
al. (2001) Chem. Mater., 13, 4595-4602. [6] Ishikawa T. et al. (2005) Corrosion Science, 47, 25102520. [7] McLennan S. M. et al. (2014) Science,
343 [8] Cornell R. M. and Schwertmann U. (2003)
Wiley, 94-100. [9] Bish D. (1993) Clay Mineral
Society, Vol. 5, 85-90. [10] Chambaere D. G. and De
Grave E. (1984) Phys. Stat. Sol., 83, 93-102.