A Food Secure Asia by 2025: Addressing Vulnerable Groups

No. 019 – 30 January 2015
RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical
issues and contemporary developments. The views of the authors are their own and do not represent the official position of the
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced electronically or in print with
prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email: [email protected] for
feedback to the Editor RSIS Commentaries, Mr Yang Razali Kassim.
A Food Secure Asia by 2025:
Addressing Vulnerable Groups
By Tamara Nair
Despite numerous international and regional conversations on food security of late, the problem of
hunger and malnourishment still persists in Asia. There is a need to relook existing strategies to
secure food for affected groups in the region if the vision of a food secure Asia is to be realised by
IN RETROSPECT, of the many grand-scale food security conversations that have taken place in
2014, few have been all-inclusive. While there are successes in terms of food security in Asia in
general, these do not address the needs of the large numbers of hungry and undernourished in the
There are growing challenges posed by hunger and undernourishment in Asia as reflected in the
inability to meet the 1996 World Food Summit (WFS) target of halving the number of undernourished
people by 2015. Perhaps the time has come to broaden the thinking as to who we should be having
conversations with and what else we should do to establish secure and equal access to food for
Beyond availability and access to food
The persistent existence of great numbers of hungry, undernourished people in Asia should prompt a
relook at existing approaches of access to and availability of food. Food security is often intertwined
with other human insecurities such as lack of economic growth, unemployment, and even unfair
economic competition and gender bias. For example women and girls often suffer food insecurities
given cultural bias in resource distribution in parts of Asia.
Recent events in the South China Sea involving illegal fishing can be a result of insecurities due to
unfair competition, pushing fishermen further beyond their fishing territories. For these groups, food
security may well extend beyond issues of increasing food production. Their insecurities can also be
steeped in cultural politics played out at the local level.
If the intention is to achieve a food secure region, where hunger and undernourishment is
considerably lowered, our ideas on food security must expand and evolve – from access and
availability to include addressing drivers of hunger and undernourishment.
Appreciating local complexities
For most Asian nations equal access to food opens up Pandora’s Box in terms of problems that can
only be collectively addressed. Some of the ways to address them are the deliberate inclusion of local
governments, local communities, welfare organisations, women’s groups and cooperatives, clan or
caste associations and human rights advocates. But first, we need to acknowledge that existing food
policies might not be effective.
Large numbers of rural and urban poor still go to bed hungry despite impressive economic growth in
the region. In addition to looking at increasing food production and trade, we also need to look at the
reasons why people are still hungry and undernourished. Hunger and undernourishment are complex
issues interwoven with several other insecurities, not just joblessness or the lack of money to buy
food. Localised strategies to identify specific conditions triggering these insecurities, including that of
food, are essential.
Expanding income-earning opportunities would be a positive step in this direction. Local development
strategies should aim towards creating employment opportunities for the poor in both rural and urban
settings. This should include job opportunities for women. Numerous local projects around Asia show
that as female (or combined household) income earning potential increases, household food
insecurity falls.
This is an effective strategy and more resources should be channelled at local levels for this to
happen. Unfair competition should be tempered through the creation of local cooperatives that can
give vulnerable small-scale food producers greater collective bargaining power in food production and
food market activities. Local government or other relevant institutions should also exercise effective
targeting strategies to identify deserving beneficiaries for various food safety nets, such as public
distribution systems, cash hand-outs or meal distribution.
Political participation
We also need to consider increasing capacities of these groups through effective political
participation. There should be opportunities for vulnerable groups to participate in development
planning and to some extent, be able to influence decisions made. Local level participation in
development strategies can create greater trust between various stakeholders in projects that address
poverty or income generation and make agencies more accountable to the beneficiaries of various
policies put in place.
These strategies are in place in several Asian countries. However, relentless hunger among the poor
and vulnerable indicates that the effectiveness of existing policies should be examined and more
should be done to fine tune its reach.
Empowering vulnerable groups with income earning potential, removing unfair competition and giving
them opportunities to exercise their rights as citizens will go a long way towards removing barriers
that result in creating food insecure groups despite well-meaning policies. These are just some of the
complexities that need attention in addition to macro-scale solutions like increased food production
and trade.
Towards a food secure ASEAN
ASEAN’s post 2015 agenda will be looking into a 10-year timeframe for food security. The
International Food Policy Research Institute has also chosen 2025 as the year the world should aim
to eradicate hunger.
The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) 2015 has strategies to enhance the long-term
competitiveness of regional food commodities. In its grand plans however, it is easy for the vulnerable
to slip through the cracks. While AEC presents opportunities for greater integration and growth we
need to exercise caution that broad regional agendas do not see some groups become ‘outliers’ in
regional development.
Governments should undertake poverty alleviation strategies and support efforts to promote
community participation. Such strategies should aim to promote greater trust between stakeholders,
provide jobs to generate incomes and help to effectively target food vulnerable groups.
By identifying the food insecure and addressing the complexities of their daily lives, issues of hunger
and undernourishment can be better determined. Enhancing the welfare and rights of the citizens can
lead to domestic policies that are more pro poor and are able to address their insecurities.
Similarly, regional trade arrangements should include measures to safeguard those who will be most
vulnerable to market instabilities. Fairer market conditions will allow ASEAN to achieve greater
equitable regional development, which will in turn contribute towards a food secure Asia.
Tamara Nair is Research Fellow with the Centre for Non Traditional Security (NTS) Studies at the S.
Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.
Nanyang Technological University
Block S4, Level B4, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798
Tel: +65 6790 6982 | Fax: +65 6794 0617 | www.rsis.edu.sg