Does time pass? New book says it does—but not in the

Does time pass? New book says it does—but
not in the way you may think
28 January 2015, by Peter Dizikes
unthreatening to our intuitions: When Skow says
time does not pass, he does not believe that
nothing ever happens. Events occur, people age,
and so on. "Things change," he agrees.
However, Skow believes that events do not sail
past us and vanish forever; they just exist in
different parts of spacetime. (Some physics
students who learn to draw diagrams of spacetime
may find this view of time intuitive.) Still, Skow's
view of time does lead to him to offer some slightly
more unusual-sounding conclusions.
Brad Skow and the cover of "Objective Becoming"
(Oxford University Press). Credit: Dominick Reuter
For instance: We exist in a "temporally scattered"
condition, as he writes in the new book.
"If you walk into a cocktail party and say, 'I don't
believe that time passes,' everyone's going to think
you're completely insane," says Brad Skow, an
associate professor of philosophy at MIT.
"The block universe theory says you're spread out
in time, something like the way you're spread out in
space," Skow says. "We're not located at a single
He would know: Skow himself doesn't believe time
passes, at least not in the way we often describe it,
through metaphorical descriptions in which we say,
as he notes, "that time flows like a river, or we
move through time the way a ship sails on the
Spotlighting the alternatives
Skow doesn't believe time is ever in motion like
this. In the first place, he says, time should be
regarded as a dimension of spacetime, as relativity
theory holds—so it does not pass by us in some
way, because spacetime doesn't. Instead, time is
part of the uniform larger fabric of the universe, not
something moving around inside it.
Now in a new book, "Objective Becoming,"
published by Oxford University Press, Skow details
this view, which philosophers call the "block
universe" theory of time.
In one sense, the block universe theory seems
In "Objective Becoming," Skow aims to convince
readers that things could hardly be otherwise. To
do so, he spends much of the book considering
competing ideas about time—the ones that assume
time does pass, or move by us in some way. "I was
interested in seeing what kind of view of the
universe you would have if you took these
metaphors about the passage of time very, very
seriously," Skow says.
In the end, Skow finds these alternatives lacking,
including one fairly popular view known as
"presentism," which holds that only events and
objects in the present can be said to exist—and that
Skow thinks defies the physics of spacetime.
Skow is more impressed by an alternative idea
called the "moving spotlight" theory, which may
allow that the past and future exist on a par with the
present. However, the theory holds, only one
moment at a time is absolutely present, and that
moment keeps changing, as if a spotlight were
moving over it. This is also consistent with relativity,
Skow thinks—but it still treats the present as being
too distinct, as if the present were cut from different
cloth than the rest of the universal fabric.
"I think the theory is fantastic," Skow writes of the
moving spotlight idea. "That is, I think it is a fantasy.
But I also have a tremendous amount of sympathy
for it." After all, the moving spotlight idea does
address our sense that there must be something
special about the present.
"The best argument for the moving spotlight theory
focuses on the seemingly incredible nature of what
the block universe theory is saying about our
experience in time," Skow adds.
Still, he says, that argument ultimately "rests on a
big confusion about what the block universe theory
is saying. Even the block universe theory agrees
that … the only experiences I'm having are the ones
I'm having now in this room." The experiences you
had a year ago or 10 years ago are still just as real,
Skow asserts; they're just "inaccessible" because
you are now in a different part of spacetime.
That may take a chunk of, well, time to digest. But
by treating the past, present, and future as
materially identical, the theory is consistent with the
laws of physics as we understand them. And at
MIT, that doesn't sound insane at all.
Provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology
This story is republished courtesy of MIT News
(, a popular site that
covers news about MIT research, innovation and
APA citation: Does time pass? New book says it does—but not in the way you may think (2015, January 28)
retrieved 6 February 2015 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part
may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
Powered by TCPDF (