MMA Issuer Brief: Strong Jan Ends

Independent & Data Driven F E B R UA RY 2 , 2 0 1 5
I C I PA L I S S U E R B R I E F Muni Bond Rates (%)
Strong or Weak Market for Bond Sellers
2.84 2.79
1.90 1.85
0.97 0.95
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Bond Maturity
Heading into this week, a similar dynamic exists that we saw last week wherein there are strong pricing implica ons for bonds maturing 10‐years and less and once
again 25‐years and longer. The ‘belly’ of the curve, as many traders refer to it, remains more difficult even as the market improved most of last week.
MARKET UPDATE A VERY STRONG JANUARY ENDS: Last week capped off one of the best Januarys for the bond markets in recent years. Municipal issuers benefited from aggressive pricing as the month ended. Power fundamental forces spurred the worldwide bond rally. IRS WEBINAR: The Internal Revenue Service’s Office of Tax Exempt Bonds will host a free‐of‐charge webinar on Thursday, February 5 at 2 pm eastern. Issuers may find the event of par cular interest as IRS staff will discuss its Voluntary Closing Agreement Program (VCAP), market segment program, compliance checks and surveys and other ac vi es for fiscal 2015. Register for the event here.
2/2/2015 BUYERS BITES:
1) Compe ve issues seeing big dealer demand
2) Nego ated issues benefit from fund flows
3) Tobacco bonds
4)Healthcare sector con nues to outperform
1) The intermediate part of the curve
Mutual funds, large domes c banks, SMAs
Weekly Cash Flows Into Municipal Mutual Funds (ICI)
Billions ($)
INVESTORS & ISSUERS: Strong performance helped issuers last week  Municipal bond interest rates moved closer to 2Q13 yields last week, as Treasuries rallied on concerns about the worldwide economy. Economic data is under a harsher microscope as inves‐
tors look to see if European woes are affec ng the U.S.  Adding fuel to the fire, last Thursday, the Federal Reserve con‐
cluded its latest monetary policy mee ng, and the minutes fo‐
cused market par cipants on the central bank’s concerns about U.S. economic health. This led to another late‐week bond rally led by an exuberant Treasury market‐ municipals lagged.  Most of the issuers that tapped into the market last week real‐
ized very strong investor demand, even as retail investors, and
their proxies, i.e. SMA’s, began to balk at these very low yields.
Secondary selling experienced a slight increase last week.  While individual investors were growing cau ous at these levels, cash con nued to flow into municipal bond funds throughout the month, about $1B per week. Mutual funds have been steadily
buying municipal bonds in 2015. (Figure 1, right)  In the compe ve space, Pennsylvania postponed its $1 billion GO issue to this week because of winter weather. Compe ve deals last week—namely San Francisco, which had large pre‐sale orders from a few big banks; and Florida’s Board of Educa on—
created a posi ve tone for the Commonwealth this week.  Aside from Pennsylvania—look to the large Trinity Healthcare issue that began selling to retail investors today as a sign for that sector (as well as the state of Wisconsin, which is a key issuer to set general high‐grade benchmarks).  Finally, a surge in tobacco trading on Friday was noteworthy, because as yields near those of May 2013, there could be an up‐
ck in tobacco refundings in 2015. 1
Figure 1: The Investment Company Ins tute (ICI) has reported con nued
strong inflows into municipal bond mutual funds in 2015. Each week, ICI
reported the weekly total into funds was near or exceeded $1B. Lipper,
another firm that reports fund flows, es mated that nearly $900 million
poured into the funds in the last week of January. (ICI reports are de‐
layed one week.) This investor‐base is important for issuers’ new‐deals
and the posi ve momentum can contribute to new‐issues doing well.
The underlying support from funds has historically established a con‐
struc ve context for issuers. However, waning inflows or ou lows can
create adversity for issuers to access capital—as occurred in 2Q13.
© 2015 Municipal
Market Analy cs, Inc.
Independent & Data Driven TOPIC OF THE WEEK: ATLANTIC CITY Yield (%)
Basis Points
TROUBLE IN NEW JERSEY: Governor Chris Chris e has appointed an emergency manager to review Atlan c City’s finances follow‐
ing problems there that include a property‐tax base that has declined by about 50% since 2010, several Atlan c City casinos that closed and le thousands unemployed, weak household income and high poverty levels. Last week Moody’s downgraded the city’s GO ra ng to Caa1 from Ba1. MMA noted to our ins tu onal investor clients last week that holders of any local New Jersey govern‐
ment debt should be concerned as it opens the window for possible debt impairment for the city and casts a shadow over the states’ local governmental debt. We expect investors to demand lower prices to own not only Atlan c City’s bonds but also most other local New Jersey credits. For example, in the figure below, note the yield on the Jersey City GO has increased since the Emer‐
gency Manager was appointed (maroon line) and the credit has moved over 20 basis points cheaper than triple‐A bonds in the same me period). Recall that in Detroit’s bankruptcy, other Michigan issuers faced similar hurdles. New Jersey has historically had a strong reputa on in suppor ng its struggling municipali es—but so did the state of Michigan before Detroit’s bankruptcy. Even more concerning has been the addi on of Kevyn Orr as an advisor to Atlan c City’s process. Mr. Orr managed Detroit’s bankruptcy and was aggressive in going a er bondholders, which may act to further depress local New Jersey prices. You can read our sum‐
mary of Detroit’s process and what it means for issuers in this November MIB. Impact on Jersey City
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU: For any municipal issuer, this could very well be yet another situa on in which obliga ons made to 2.40
investors are not met, which all else being equal, means higher borrowing costs. To be clear, the city has not entered bankruptcy 2.30
but these are signs that this is where the situa on may be head‐
ed. The sugges on that bonded debt is under a ack means every 2.20
New Jersey local government issuer’s credit quality is weaker be‐
cause reliable, bondholder‐friendly state support has evaporated. 2.10
That another city’s well‐publicized problems are now being taken 2.00
over by the state with signs of an an ‐bondholder process pend‐
ing, means the en re industry and issuer community could take Axis Title
another black eye in terms of pledge security. Difference from AAA Benchmark
Jersey City GO
REGULATORY ROUND‐UP FOCUS TURNS TO 15c2‐12: Many market par cipants last month sent comments to the SEC on its Rule 15c2‐12, following the SEC’s request for comment last year. The SEC was specifical‐
ly seeking comments on the length of me it takes to comply with the Rule. The SEC es mated 45 minutes for issuers to com‐
ply with annual filings, 45 for event filings, and 30 for failure to file notes. Addi onally the SEC es mated broker/dealer compli‐
ance at 300 hours per year, or 1.2 hours for every broker/dealer working in municipals. In its response, the Government Finance Officers Associa on said that in many instances the es mates appear low, and provided addi onal me necessary to comply with the Rule: annual filings 4 to 9 hours, event filings 1 to 4 hours, and 1 to 2 hours for failure to file. Other groups took this opportunity to say the Rule is outdated and should be updated as more disclosure opportuni es have come online. Groups including the Securi es Industry and Finan‐
cial Markets Associa on (SIFMA), the Na onal Associa on of Bond Lawyers (NABL) and the Bond Dealers of America (BDA) sent le ers to the SEC making the case for a simplified rule as well as refu ng the me that it takes for par cipants to make disclosures. The Municipal Securi es Rulemaking Board (MSRB) also 2/2/2015 weighed in on the topic, urging the SEC to “conduct an extensive review of the disclosure requirements in the municipal securi es market” outlined in Rule 15c2‐12. The MSRB pledged its support for a thorough review of the Rule and encouraged the SEC to look at disclosure standards for bank borrowing, including hav‐
ing the SEC look to the standards for the corporate market as a precedent for off‐balance sheet borrowing. Also last week, the MSRB again called for issuers to disclose their bank borrowing in a market advisory. Keep in mind that an SEC report in 2012 on the municipal indus‐
try suggested possible changes to Rule 15c2‐12, and with an increased focus at the SEC on issuers and disclosure, there could be modifica ons forthcoming. Also government officials in two ci es last week were banned from the municipal market and fined by the SEC—two in Allen Park, Michigan and one in Har‐
vey, Illinois. Meanwhile, the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspec ons and Ex‐
amina ons (OCIE) released its 2015 priori es, which include con nuing to monitor newly regulated Municipal Advisors (MAs) with examina ons as well as protec ng retail investors. 2 MMA
Independent & Data Driven REGIONAL BOND ISSUES (Moody’s/S&P/Fitch) NORTHEAST
1/26: Roosevelt & Cross Inc. priced $4.3 million general obliga on bonds for the Avon Central School District, NY; NR/A+/NR; non‐
callable: 1/29: JPMorgan Securi es LLC priced $188 million general obliga on bonds for New Castle County, Delaware; Aaa/AAA/AAA; callable at par in 10/1/2025: Maturity
+/‐ AAA 5%
+/‐ AAA 5%
2015 2020 1.50 2.00 0.45 1.26 N/A +29 2020 2025 5.00 5.00 1.15 1.85 +20 +4 2021 2.00 1.40 +15 2045 5.00 2.64 ‐15 Notes: Shorter maturi es found good NY retail interest for this SD.
Notes: In 30‐years the issuer sold 15bps richer than the Benchmark.
SOUTHEAST 1/26: RBC Capital Markets priced $11 million general obliga on bonds for the Morgan County School District, Colorado; Aa2/NR/NR; callable at par in 12/1/2024: 1/29: The Florida Board of Educa on sold $234 million of public edu‐
ca on capital outlay refunding bonds to Wells Fargo Securi es; Aa1/
AAA/AAA; callable at par in 6/1/2024:
+/‐ AAA 5%
2020 2026 2034 5.00 5,00 5.00 1.50 2.40 2.90 +53 +43 +33 Notes: Marijuana could provide new revenue for CO schools.
2020 Coupon
5.00 Yield
1.11 +/‐ AAA 5%
+16 2025 2029 5.00 3.00 1.89 2.75 +4 +58 Notes: This high‐grade issuer help set the general market tone.
1/26: Raymond James & Associates priced $23.3 million general obli‐
ga on bonds for the Burnet Cons Independent School District, Texas; Aa3/NR/NR; callable at par in 8/1/2024: 1/28: The City and County of San Francisco, California sold $292 million general obliga on bonds to JPMorgan Securi es LLC; Aa1/
AA+/AA; callable at par in 6/15/2023: Maturity
2020 Coupon
3.00 Yield
1.31 +/‐ AAA 5%
+34 2025 5.00 2.12 +22 +5 2035 5.00 2.66 Notes: Texas school districts con nue to see demand. 2/2/2015 Maturity
2020 Coupon
5.00 Yield
1.04 +/‐ AAA 5%
+8 2025 5.00 1.82 ‐5 2030 4.00 2.59 +31 Notes: Large pre‐sale allowed for strong levels on this deal. 3