English - unfccc

United Nations
FCCC/WEB/MA/FIN/2014
Distr.: General
2 February 2015
English only
Summary report on the multilateral assessment of Finland
at the forty-first session of the Subsidiary Body for
Implementation
Note by the secretariat
I.
Background
1.
The Conference of the Parties, by decision 1/CP.16, decided that developed country
Parties should enhance the reporting in their national communications and submit biennial
reports on their progress in achieving emission reductions. It also established a new process
under the Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI) – the international assessment and
review (IAR) of emissions and removals related to developed country Parties’ quantified
economy-wide emission reduction targets – that aims to promote the comparability of
efforts among all developed country Parties. The first round of the IAR process is to be
conducted during the period 2014–2015.
2.
According to the modalities and procedures for IAR specified in annex II to decision
2/CP.17, the multilateral assessment (MA), being part of the IAR process, is to be
conducted for each developed country Party at a working group session of the SBI, with the
participation of all Parties. The aim of the MA is to assess each Party’s progress in
implementation towards the achievement of emission reductions and removals related to its
quantified economy-wide emission reduction target.
3.
The first MA of Finland took place at a working group session during SBI 41, on
6 December 2014. Such a working group session is preceded by a three-month period of
questions and answers; in the first month, any Party may submit written questions to the
Party being assessed, which may respond to the questions within the remaining two months.
Questions for Finland had been submitted in writing two months before the working group
session by the following delegations: China, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. The United States of
America submitted written questions after the deadline. A list of the questions received and
the answers provided by Finland can be found on the IAR web page for Finland.1
1
GE.
<http://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/biennial_reports_and_iar/international_assessment_
and_review/application/pdf/sbi41-finland-full.pdf>.
FCCC/WEB/MA/FIN/2014
II. Proceedings
4.
The working group session was chaired by the SBI Chair, Mr. Amena Yauvoli.
Finland was represented by Mr. Harri Laurikka, Chief Negotiator of the Ministry of the
Environment of Finland.
5.
Mr. Laurikka made an opening presentation, summarizing Finland’s progress in
implementation towards the achievement of emission reductions and removals related to its
quantified economy-wide emission reduction targets. Emissions excluding the land use,
land-use change and forestry sector decreased between 1990 and 2012 in Finland, with an
annual decrease in both the emission intensity of the economy and emissions per capita
over the same period. The use of bioenergy more than doubled during this period, which
contributed to replacing fossil fuels in the energy supply. According to Mr. Laurikka,
Finland is estimated to overachieve its target in the first commitment period of the Kyoto
Protocol by 13.5 Mt of carbon dioxide equivalent. Finland is also prepared to ratify the
Doha Amendment in order to implement its emission reduction commitment for the period
2013–2020.
6.
Mr. Laurikka presented Finland’s targets by 2020 at a disaggregated level, covering
targets for the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) sectors, sectors
outside the EU ETS, renewable energy, biofuels in transport and improvements in energy
efficiency. Based on current greenhouse gas emission projections, Finland is on track to
meet these targets. Key policies and measures are in place to ensure the achievement of the
target for 2020 and beyond, including the national energy and climate strategy and a road
map on climate and energy policy up to 2050. In addition, the Climate Change Act was
prepared and presented to the Parliament in June 2014.
7.
The opening presentation was followed by interventions and questions from the
following delegations: China, Brazil and United States. These questions were on the
additional efforts that Finland will need to make in order to transition from the current 20
per cent emission reduction target to the conditional 30 per cent target; the current share of
renewable energy sources (RES) in the energy mix, as an indication of whether Finland is
on track to meet its 2020 RES target; actions related to the National Forest Programme.
Moreover, further explanation was demanded on why the land sector is not included in the
2020 target given the significance of this sector in the Finnish economy. In response, the
Finnish delegation provided further explanations. Details can be found in the webcast of
this session on the IAR web page for Finland.
8.
In closing, the SBI Chair reminded Finland that any other observations by the Party
on its MA process can be submitted within two months of the working group session, and
that this will form part of its Party record for the MA. The SBI Chair thanked the delegation
of Finland, all the other delegations, and the secretariat for this successful MA session.
2